Would Hillary Clinton have made a better President than Donald J Trump?

Yes, Hillary Clinton would have made a better President than tr*mp. Here are few more examples of those would have been better Presidents than him:

* A randomly-selected homeless person

* My pet maltipoo

* A goldfish

* A canned ham

* Mr. Potato Head

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is the US pursuing socialism?

Image
  “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” -Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride Before one can argue about something, I think it’s a good idea to define what it means, yes? Merriam-Webster defines socialism as “any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods; a system of society or group living in which there is no private property.” So, let’s be crystal clear about something: no major political party in the US is promoting collective ownership and administration of production of goods. None of them . Supporting a higher marginal tax rate on the rich is not socialism. If you don’t understand marginal taxation**, that indicates you’re not able to contribute intelligently to this discussion, so please, kindly, shut up. Support for unions is not socialism. Support for the some sort of health care reform is not, in and o...
Read more

Pros + Cons of Restoring the Draft

Pro: huge increase in easily available troops Pro: given that going through the draft & military experience was a common experience for young American men*+, it provided an opportunity for people from a vast variety of socio-economic groups & regions to connect.** Con: it's generally accepted that the current, all volunteer force is one of the best, if not the best, militaries in the world. Conscript armies are never as well-trained as all-volunteer armies, even if they are larger. The horrendous performance of Russian's enormous, conscript-heavy force is a perfect example of this. Con: related to the previous point, conscripts, by and large, don't want to be there. This absolutely relates to the above con to a draft. The combination of these first two cons is a major reason why most in the leadership of the US military don't want the reinstatement of the draft. Con: again, related to the above points, the elites of any society have always ha...
Read more

Why is it that the United States finds itself deficient in many of the qualities that powered its rise?

TL:DR: education Longer answer: lack of education. A main reason for the US’ rise to prominence and power in the 20th century was that, in addition to an embarrassment of riches in natural resources, we had arguably the best-educated general populace in the world. As such, after WWII ended, the US had the enviable combination of a resources, the only first-world infrastructure that hadn’t been blown to smithereens- that had, actually, been helped by war production- and a workforce ready to exploit all of these. Unfortunately, my lifetime (b. 1970) has seen a long-running, elite consensus to misfund public education. It works something like this: “you want lower taxes?” “Sure!” “Let me cut your property taxes, then!” “Sure!” Given that property taxes are the primary funding source for public education in the US, this results in many students receiving less education. Their kids, therefore fall for this con the same way, and are easier to trick into repeating it. Poorly-...
Read more